4.3 Article

Comorbidity, socioeconomic status and multiple sclerosis

Journal

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL
Volume 14, Issue 8, Pages 1091-1098

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1352458508092263

Keywords

comorbidity; epidemiology; multiple sclerosis; socioeconomic status

Funding

  1. NIH
  2. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  3. Multidisciplinary Clinical Research Career Development Program [K12 HD04909]
  4. Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective Multiple sclerosis (MS) is associated with substantial morbidity. The impact of comorbidity on MS is unknown, but comorbidity may explain some of the unpredictable progression. Comorbidity is common in the general population, and is associated with adverse health outcomes. To begin understanding the impact of comorbidity on MS, we need to know the breadth, type, and frequencies of comorbidities among MS patients. Using the North American Research Committee on Multiple Sclerosis (NARCOMS) Registry, we aimed to describe comorbidities and their demographic predictors in MS. Methods In October 2006, we queried NARCOMS participants regarding physical comorbidities. Of 16,141 participants meeting the inclusion criteria, 8983 (55.7%) responded. Results Comorbidity was relatively common; if we considered conditions which are very likely to be accurately self-reported, then 3280 (36.7%) reported at least one physical comorbidity. The most frequently reported comorbidities were hypercholesterolemia (37%), hypertension (30%), and arthritis (16%). Associated with the risk of comorbidity were being male [ females vs. males, odds ratio (OR) 0.77; 0.69-0.87]; age (age >60 years vs. age <= 44 years, OR 5.91; 4.95-7.06); race (African Americans vs. Whites, OR 1.46; 1.06-2.03); and socioeconomic status (Income <$15,000 vs. Income >$100,000, OR 1.37; 1.10-1.70). Conclusions Comorbidity is common in MS and similarly associated with socioeconomic status.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available