4.3 Article

Longitudinal magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging of primary progressive multiple sclerosis patients treated with glatiramer acetate: multicenter study

Journal

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages 73-80

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1352458507079907

Keywords

glatiramer acetate; MRI; MRSI; N-acetylaspartate; primary progressive multiple sclerosis; proton spectroscopic imaging

Funding

  1. NIBIB NIH HHS [R01 EB02095] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BIOMEDICAL IMAGING AND BIOENGINEERING [R01EB002095] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multicenter proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) studies were performed on 58 primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) patients from four centers for investigating the efficacy of glatiramer acetate (GA) treatment. These patients were drawn from 943 subjects who participated in the PROMiSe trial. In these MRSI studies, patients were followed over a period of 3 years. MRSI data were acquired by all the centers using the same pulse sequence, and spectral analysis was performed at a single site using a customized analysis software package. Quantitative metabolite ratios, N-acetyl aspartate (NAA)/creatine (Cr) and choline (Cho)/Cr, were compared between GA-treated and placebo- treated PPMS patients. There was no significant difference in metabolite ratios between GA-treated and placebo-treated patients. The difference in metabolite ratios between the normal-appearing tissues (NAT) and lesion-containing regions (LCR) in GA treated patients was not significantly different from placebo treated patients. Strong lipid resonances, even in the absence of lesions, were observed on MRSI data in both gray matter and white matter in placebo- and GA-treated PPMS patients. No significant difference in number of patients with lipids between the two groups over a period of 3 years was found.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available