4.3 Review

New approaches for improving selectivity and sensitivity of resistive gas sensors: a review

Journal

SENSOR REVIEW
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages 340-347

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/SR-12-2014-0747

Keywords

Noise; Gas sensors; Detection methods; Low-frequency noise; Photo-catalytic effect

Funding

  1. National Science Center, Poland [DEC-2012/06/M/ST7/00444]
  2. European Research Council under the European Community's Seventh Framework Program (FP7)/ERC [267234]
  3. Spanish Government [TEC2012-32420]
  4. Catalan Government [SGR 1,267]
  5. Ministry of Economy and Competiveness (MINECO), Spain
  6. Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies via ICREA Academia Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose - This paper aims to present the methods of improving selectivity and sensitivity of resistance gas sensors. Design/methodology/approach - This paper compares various methods of improving gas sensing by temperature modulation, UV irradiation or fluctuation-enhanced sensing. The authors analyze low-frequency resistance fluctuations in commercial Taguchi gas sensors and the recently developed tungsten trioxide (WO3) gas-sensing layers, exhibiting a photo-catalytic effect. Findings - The efficiency of using low-frequency fluctuations to improve gas detection selectivity and sensitivity was confirmed by numerous experimental studies in commercial and prototype gas sensors. Research limitations/implications - A more advanced measurement setup is required to record noise data but it will reduce the number of gas sensors necessary for identifying the investigated gas mixtures. Practical implications - Fluctuation-enhanced sensing can reduce the energy consumption of gas detection systems and assures better detection results. Originality/value - A thorough comparison of various gas sensing methods in resistance gas sensors is presented and supported by exemplary practical applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available