4.6 Article

Nasal DNA-MVA SIV vaccination provides more significant protection from progression to AIDS than a similar intramuscular vaccination

Journal

MUCOSAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages 536-550

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/mi.2009.103

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH-NIAID [RQ1AI058707]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Preventive human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) vaccination may require induction of virus-specific immune responses at mucosal sites to contain viral infection locally after exposure, as most HIV infections occur through mucosal surfaces. We compared the efficacy of an intranasal or intramuscular Simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)+ interleukin (IL)-2+IL-15 DNA/SIV-MVA (modified vaccinia virus Ankara) vaccination in preventing disease progression in SIVmac251 intrarectally challenged rhesus macaques. SIV-specific rectal IgA responses were more significantly persistent in nasally vaccinated than in intramuscularly vaccinated animals. No significant differences were observed in the magnitude of systemic T-cell responses between the two groups, although the nasal immunization induced more significant anti-SIV T-cell responses in the colorectal mucosa. After challenge, CD4(+) central memory (C M) T-cell preservation and significant disease-delay were observed in both vaccination groups. However, nasally vaccinated animals had more significant early preservation of circulating and colorectal CD4(+) C M T cells, of circulating CD4(+)/alpha 4 beta 7(+) effector memory (E-M) T cells, and a longer disease-free interval when compared with the intramuscularly vaccinated or control groups. Regardless of vaccination status, long-term viremia control and preservation of CD4(+) C-M T cells was detected in animals with significantly higher systemic CD8(+)/tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha(+) and CD8(+)/interferon (IFN)-gamma(+) T-cell responses and higher SIV-specific CD4(+)/IL-2(+) responses in colorectal T cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available