4.6 Article

RORγt is dispensable for the development of intestinal mucosal T cells

Journal

MUCOSAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 1, Issue 3, Pages 198-207

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/mi.2008.4

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [13GS0015]
  2. Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  3. Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare
  4. Keio University
  5. MEXT
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [13GS0015] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To examine the origin of intestinal mucosal T cells and, in particular, unconventional CD8 alpha(+) T cells, we have undertaken a thorough analysis of the gut immune compartment in euthymic and athymic mice carrying either wild-type or mutant transcription factor retinoic acid-related orphan receptor-gamma t(ROR gamma t). We identified a previously unrealized complexity of gut cryptopatch (CP) cells that challenges the previous assertion that CP cells comprise ROR gamma t-expressing adult counterparts of fetal lymphoid tissue inducer (Lti) cells. We showed that many CP cells express intermediate T cell differentiation markers, whether or not they express ROR gamma t, and found that CPs are not completely dependent on ROR gamma t, as previously reported, but merely fewer in number in the ROR gamma t-deficient condition. Indeed, c-kit(+)IL-7R(+)Lin(-)ROR gamma t(-) cells inside the CP and c-kit(+)IL-7R(+)Lin(-)ROR gamma t(-) and c-kit(+)IL-7R(+)Lin(-)ROR gamma t(low) cells outside the CP basically remain in the gut mucosa of ROR gamma t-deficient ROR gamma t(EGFP/EGFP) mice. Consistent with these non-Lti-like c-kit(+)IL(-)7R(+)Lin(-) cells being gut T cell progenitors, ROR gamma t-deficient mice develop the normal number of intestinal mucosal T cells. These results clearly reassert the intraintestinal differentiation of the body's largest peripheral T cell subpopulation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available