4.6 Article

Layered oxides as positive electrode materials for Na-ion batteries

Journal

MRS BULLETIN
Volume 39, Issue 5, Pages 416-422

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1557/mrs.2014.85

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. JSPS through KAKENHI [21750194]
  2. Funding for NEXT Program
  3. MEXT program Elements Strategy Initiative to Form Core Research Center
  4. NSG Foundation for Materials Science and Engineering
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21750194] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Considering the need for designing better batteries to meet the rapidly growing demand for large-scale energy storage applications, an aspect of primary importance for battery materials is elemental abundance. To achieve sustainable energy development, we must reconsider the feasibility of a sustainable lithium supply, which is essential for lithium(-ion) batteries. Lithium is widely distributed in the Earth, but is not regarded as an abundant element. Therefore, widespread use of large-scale lithium batteries would be inevitably restricted. Sodium (-ion) batteries are thus promising candidates for large-scale applications because sodium is the most advantageous next to lithium considering its atomic weight, standard potential, and natural abundance. Rechargeable sodium-ion batteries consist of two different sodium insertion materials similar to Li-ion batteries. Sodium insertion materials, especially layered oxides, have been studied since the early 1980s, but not extensively for energy storage devices due to the expanded interest in lithium insertion materials in the 1990s. In recent years, materials researchers have again been extensively exploring new sodium insertion materials to enhance battery performance. This article reviews recent advancements and trends in layered sodium transition metal oxides as positive electrode materials for Na-ion batteries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available