4.6 Article

Asymmetric electrochemical capacitors-Stretching the limits of aqueous electrolytes

Journal

MRS BULLETIN
Volume 36, Issue 7, Pages 513-522

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1557/mrs.2011.137

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Office of Naval Research
  2. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  3. Ministere Francais des Affaires Etrangeres of France
  4. Ministere des Relations Internationales of Quebec
  5. ABHYS French ANR

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ongoing technological advances in such disparate areas as consumer electronics, transportation, and energy generation and distribution are often hindered by the capabilities of current energy storage/conversion systems, thereby driving the search for high-performance power sources that are also economically viable, safe to operate, and have limited environmental impact. Electrochemical capacitors (ECs) are a class of energy-storage devices that fill the gap between the high specific energy of batteries and the high specific power of conventional electrostatic capacitors. The most widely available commercial EC, based on a symmetric configuration of two high-surface-area carbon electrodes and a nonaqueous electrolyte, delivers specific energies of up to similar to 6 Whkg(-1) with sub-second response times. Specific energy can be enhanced by moving to asymmetric configurations and selecting electrode materials (e.g., transition metal oxides) that store charge via rapid and reversible faradaic reactions. Asymmetric EC designs also circumvent the main limitation of aqueous electrolytes by extending their operating voltage window beyond the thermodynamic 1.2 V limit to operating voltages approaching similar to 2 V, resulting in high-performance ECs that will satisfy the challenging power and energy demands of emerging technologies and in a more economically and environmentally friendly form than conventional symmetric ECs and batteries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available