4.6 Article

Evidence for Subtypes of Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease

Journal

MOVEMENT DISORDERS
Volume 33, Issue 7, Pages 1174-1178

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mds.27417

Keywords

Freezing of gait; Parkinson's disease; motor; cognitive; affective; limbic; heterogeneity

Funding

  1. Parkinson Canada Fellowship
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council CJ Martin Fellowship [1072403]
  3. Western Sydney University Postgraduate Research Award
  4. NHMRC-ARC Dementia Fellowship [1110414]
  5. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia program [1037746, 1095127]
  6. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1072403] Funding Source: NHMRC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The purpose of this study is to identify and characterize subtypes of freezing of gait by using a novel questionnaire designed to delineate freezing patterns based on self-reported and behavioral gait assessment. Methods: A total of 41 Parkinson's patients with freezing completed the Characterizing Freezing of Gait questionnaire that identifies situations that exacerbate freezing. This instrument underwent examination for construct validity and internal consistency, after which a data-driven clustering approach was employed to identify distinct patterns amongst individual responses. Behavioral freezing assessments in both dopaminergic states were compared across 3 identified subgroups. Results: This novel questionnaire demonstrated construct validity (severity scores correlated with percentage of time frozen; r=0.54) and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha=.937), and thus demonstrated promising utility for identifying patterns of freezing that are independently related to motor, anxiety, and attentional impairments. Conclusions: Patients with freezing may be dissociable based on underlying neurobiological underpinnings that would have significant implications for targeting future treatments. (C) 2018 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available