4.6 Article

How to identify tremor dominant and postural instability/gait difficulty groups with the movement disorder society unified Parkinson's disease rating scale: Comparison with the unified Parkinson's disease rating scale

Journal

MOVEMENT DISORDERS
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages 668-670

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mds.25383

Keywords

Parkinson's disease; Rating scales; Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale; MDS-UPDRS

Funding

  1. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) [U01NS043127]
  2. Parkinson's Disease Foundation Parkinson's Research Center
  3. Boehringer-Ingelheim USA
  4. GlaxoSmithKline
  5. Pfizer, Inc.
  6. Parkinson's UK [J-0802] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Formulas were developed to define tremor dominant (TD) and postural instability/gait difficulty (PIGD) phenotypes of Parkinson's Disease (PD) using the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS). TD and PIGD designations, based on the original Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), provided useful designations for classifying different phenotypes of PD. With the advent of the MDS-UPDRS, a valid set of calculations for these phenotypes is needed. Methods UPDRS and MDS-UPDRS scores were collected on 877 PD patients. TD/PIGD scores were calculated using the UPDRS formula for all patients. Comparable TD and PIGD items from the MDS-UPDRS were used to calculate new ratios. Data were analyzed using receiver operating characteristic models. Results The new MDS-UPDRS TD/PIGD ratios accounted for a significant area under the curve compared with the UPDRS classification. Optimal sensitivity and specificity were obtained with MDS-UPDRS cutoff scores of 1.15 for TD classification and 0.90 for PIGD. Conclusions The development of comparable and valid PIGD and TD scores from the MDS-UPDRS provides a clear method for clinicians and researchers to transition from the original UPDRS to the new MDS-UPDRS in categorizing patients with different clinical phenotypes. (c) 2013 Movement Disorder Society

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available