4.6 Article

Correlation Between Kinesia System Assessments and Clinical Tremor Scores in Patients with Essential Tremor

Journal

MOVEMENT DISORDERS
Volume 25, Issue 12, Pages 1938-1943

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mds.23201

Keywords

essential tremor; clinical rating scale; Kinesia; motion transducers

Funding

  1. CleveMed
  2. Cleveland Medical Device Inc. (CleveMed)
  3. National Parkinson Foundation (NPF)
  4. Allergan, Inc.
  5. Boehringer-Ingelheim, Inc.
  6. Ceregene, Inc.
  7. Chelsea Therapeutics
  8. Helis Foundation
  9. Huntington's Disease Society of America
  10. Huntington Study Group
  11. Impax Pharmaceuticals
  12. Ipsen Limited
  13. Lundbeck Inc.
  14. Medtronic
  15. Merz Pharmaceuticals
  16. National Institutes of Health
  17. National Parkinson's Foundation
  18. Neurogen
  19. St. Jude Medical
  20. Teva
  21. University of Rochester
  22. Parkinson's Study Group

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The primary aim of this study was to determine whether scores on The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale (TETRAS) correlate with quantitative assessments using the Kinesia (TM) (CleveMed) system in patients with essential tremor (ET). Patients sequentially evaluated and diagnosed with ET at the Parkinson's Disease Center and Movement Disorders Clinic, Baylor College of Medicine were enrolled in the study. The Kinesia portable device was attached to the wrist and subjects were instructed to hold their arms in an outstretched position and then touch their nose while data were wirelessly transmitted to a computer. Subjects were rated on the arm where the system was placed using specific TETRAS items. A linear regression model was constructed for each task using the logarithmic values of both clinical scores and objective motion data parameters to compute a Kinesia score. Twenty subjects underwent complete clinical TETRAS and Kinesia quantitative assessments. TETRAS clinical scores significantly correlated with predicted Kinesia quantitative variables for postural (r = 0.738; P < 0.001) and kinetic (r = 0.57; P = 0.009) tremor. We conclude that the Kinesia system may, therefore, have a utility in quantitative assessments of ET when combined with standard clinical assessment. (C) 2010 Movement Disorder Society

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available