4.6 Article

Safety and Efficacy of Perampanel in Advanced Parkinson's Disease: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study

Journal

MOVEMENT DISORDERS
Volume 25, Issue 7, Pages 896-905

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mds.22974

Keywords

Parkinson's disease; motor fluctuations; dyskinesia; perampanel; AMPA receptor antagonist

Funding

  1. German Ministry of Education and Health
  2. Pitzer Foundation
  3. Rhon Foundation
  4. Eisai Co., Ltd.
  5. Boehringer Ingelheim
  6. Novartis
  7. Schwarz Pharma/UCB
  8. Merck Serono
  9. Solvay
  10. Lundbeck
  11. MJ Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research
  12. Rentschler
  13. ZLB Behring
  14. University of Marburg
  15. PSP Association and Weston Trust-The Reta Lila Howard Foundation
  16. GlaxoSmithKline
  17. Schering
  18. Teva Neuroscience
  19. UCB
  20. Eisai
  21. Teva
  22. Boehringer-Ingelheim
  23. Orion Pharma
  24. Schering Plough
  25. Springer-Verlag, Italy
  26. Valeant
  27. Libra (Merck)
  28. Czech Ministry of Health
  29. Czech Ministry of Education
  30. Czech Republic

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Perampanel, a novel, noncompetitive, selective AMPA-receptor antagonist demonstrated evidence of efficacy in reducing motor symptoms in animal models of Parkinson's disease (PD). We assessed the safety and efficacy of perampanel for treatment of wearing off motor fluctuations in patients with PD. Patients (N = 263) were randomly assigned to once-daily add-on 0.5, 1, or 2 mg of perampanel or placebo. The primary objective was to determine whether there was a dose-response relationship for efficacy among the 3 perampanel doses and placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint for each treatment was measured as the least-squares (LS) mean change from baseline to week 12 in percent off' time reduction during the waking day, as recorded by patient diaries. The primary efficacy analysis was a I-sided Williams test for dose-response trend at the 0.025 level of significance. At week 12, dose-response trends, as determined by the Wilhams test, were not statistically significant for LS mean reduction in percent off time during the waking day (P 0.061, with significance defined as P <= 0.025). The 2 higher perampanel doses (ITT population; n = 258) produced nonsignificant reductions from baseline to week 12 in percent off time during the waking day versus placebo (7.59%, P = 0.421 [1 mg], 8.60%, P = 0.257 [2 mg] versus 5.05% [placebo]; significance for pairwise comparisons defined as P <= 0.05). There were no significant changes in dyskinesia or cognitive function in any perampanel group versus placebo. Adverse events were similar across treatment groups. Perampanel treatment was well tolerated and safe, but failed to achieve statistical significance in primary and secondary endpoints. (C) 2010 Movement Disorder Society

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available