4.6 Article

Long-Term Antidyskinetic Efficacy of Amantadine in Parkinson's Disease

Journal

MOVEMENT DISORDERS
Volume 25, Issue 10, Pages 1357-1363

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mds.23034

Keywords

Parkinson's disease; amantadine; dyskinesia

Funding

  1. Austrian Parkinson's Disease Study Group
  2. Merz Pharma GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany
  3. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [J2783-B09]
  4. National Institutes of Health
  5. Allergan
  6. Boehringer Ingelheim
  7. Astra Zeneca

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Several randomized placebo-controlled trials have consistently shown antidyskinetic effects of amantadine in levodopa treated patients with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). However, all of these were of short duration and there have been claims that the effect of amantadine on levodopa induced dyskinesias (LID's) wear off after about 9 months of treatment. This randomized placebo-controlled parallel-group study was performed to assess the long-term antidyskinetic effect of amantadine in 32 PD patients, who after having been on stable amantadine therapy for LID over at least one year- were switched in a double blind manner to amantadine or placebo and followed for 3 weeks. Dyskinesia duration and intensity were assessed by UPDRS IV items 32 and 33 as well as by patient's diaries. The primary outcome was the score change of UPDRS IV items 32 + 33 between baseline and 3 weeks after treatment as well as the between treatment group comparison of the score change of UPDRS IV items 32 + 33. There was a significant increase of UPDRS IV items 32 + 33 in patients treated with placebo from 3.06 (95% CI, 2.1-4.03) at baseline to 4.28 (95% Cl, 3.1-5.4) at three-week follow-up (P = 0.02) compared with no significant change between baseline 3.2 (95% CI, 2.1-4.4) to follow-up 3.6 (95% Cl, 2.3-4.8) in patients staying on amantadine. These findings argue for long-term antidyskinetic efficacy of amantadine in PD patients with LID's. (C) 2010 Movement Disorder Society

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available