4.6 Article

Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Overnight Switching from Immediate- to Once Daily Extended-Release Pramipexole in Early Parkinson's Disease

Journal

MOVEMENT DISORDERS
Volume 25, Issue 14, Pages 2326-2332

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mds.23262

Keywords

pramipexole-extended release; Parkinson's disease; dopamine agonist; switch trial

Funding

  1. Boehringer Ingelheim
  2. Curry Rockefeller Group, Tarrytown, NY
  3. Eisai
  4. GlaxoSmithKline
  5. Lundbeck
  6. Novartis
  7. Schering
  8. Solvay
  9. Teva Neuroscience
  10. UCB
  11. Merck-Serono
  12. Schwarz Pharma/UCB
  13. Allergan Neuroscience
  14. Embryon
  15. Genzyme
  16. Impax
  17. Ipsen Pharmaceuticals (formerly Vernalis)
  18. Kyowa Pharmaceutical
  19. Merck
  20. Quintiles
  21. Santhera
  22. Schering Plough
  23. Orion
  24. Teva
  25. Teva-Lundbeck

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this article is to test the feasibility, in early Parkinson's disease (PD), of an overnight switch from immediate-release (IR) pramipexole to a new once-daily extended-release (ER) formulation. Nonfluctuating patients on pramipexole IR three-times daily, alone or with levodopa, for early PD were randomly switched overnight to double-blind IR three-times daily (N = 52) or ER once-daily (N = 104) at initially unchanged daily dosage. Successful switching (defined as no worsening >15% of baseline UPDRS II+III score and no drug-related adverse event withdrawal) was assessed at 9 weeks, after optional dosage adjustments (primary endpoint), and at 4 weeks, before adjustment. Other secondary endpoints included adjusted mean changes from baseline in UPDRS scores and proportion of responders based on Clinical or Patient Global Impression (CGI/PGI). Absolute difference between percentage of successful switch to ER versus IR was tested for ER noninferiority, defined as a 95% confidence-interval lower bound not exceeding -15%. At 9 weeks, 84.5% of the ER group had been successfully switched, versus 94.2% for IR. Noninferiority was not demonstrated, with a difference of -9.76% (95% CI: [-18.81%, +1.66%]). At 4 weeks, 81.6% of the ER group had been successfully switched, versus 92.3% for IR, a difference of -10.75% (95% CI: [-20.51%, +1.48%]). UPDRS changes and CGI/PGI analyses showed no differences between the groups. Both formulations were safe and well tolerated. Pramipexole ER was not equivalent to IR, but the difference was marginal. The fact that >80% of the patients successfully switched overnight at unchanged dosage shows that this practice was feasible in most patients. (C) 2010 Movement Disorder Society

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available