4.6 Article

Expanding the Clinical Phenotype of SNCA Duplication Carriers

Journal

MOVEMENT DISORDERS
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages 1811-1819

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mds.22682

Keywords

Parkinson's disease; SNCA duplication; PET; dementia; reduced penetrance

Funding

  1. MEXT of Japan [20023028]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20023028] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

SNCA duplication is a recognized cause of familial Parkinson's disease (PD). We aimed to explore the genetic and clinical variability in the disease manifestation. Molecular characterization was performed using real-time PCR, SNP arrays, and haplotype analysis. We further Studied those patients who were found to harbor SNCA duplication with olfactory function tests. polysomnography, and PET. We identified four new families and one sporadic patient with SNCA duplication. Eleven symptomatic patients from these four families presented with parkinsonism, of which three subsequently developed dementia. The lifetime estimate of overall penetrance was 43.8%. FDG-PET study of symptomatic patients showed hypometabolism in the occipital lobe, whereas asymptomatic carriers of SNCA duplication demonstrated normal glucose metabolism. Symptomatic patients showed abnormal olfactory function and polysomnography and asymptomatic carriers showed normal results. The clinical features of SNCA duplication include parkinsonism with or Without dementia. Asymptomatic carriers displayed normal test results with the eldest individual aged 79 years; thus, even a carrier of SNCA duplication may escape the development of PD. This difference in age-associated penetrance may be due to the genetic background or environmental exposures. Further studies of SNCA duplication carriers will help identify discase-modifiers and may open novel avenues for future treatment. (C) 2009 Movement Disorder Society

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available