4.6 Article

Replacement of Dopaminergic Medication with Subthalamic Nucleus Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: Long-Term Observation

Journal

MOVEMENT DISORDERS
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages 557-563

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mds.22390

Keywords

Parkinson's disease; surgery; deep brain stimulation; subthalamic nucleus; levodopa; dopamine agonists

Funding

  1. Italian Ministry of University and Research [2001062543]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is an effective treatment for advanced Parkinson's disease (PD), but the medication requirements after implant are poorly known. We performed a long-term prospective evaluation of 20 patients maintained at stable dopaminergic therapy for 5 years after bilateral STN implants, who were evaluated 6 months. 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years after surgery. We measured, during the entire observation period, the effect of deep brain stimulation on motor and functional outcome measures, the levodopa equivalent daily dose and the total electrical energy delivered. At 5 years, the UPDRS motor score had improved by 54.2% and levodopa equivalent dose was reduced by 61.9%, compared with preimplant. Dopaminergic medication remained stable during the observation period, but energy was progressively increased over time. Rest tremor, rigidity, gait. lower and upper limb akinesia, and total axial score were improved in decreasing order. Postural stability and speech improved transiently, whereas on-period freezing of gait, motor fluctuations and dyskinesias recovered durably. Functional measures did not show improvement in autonomy and daily living, activities after STN implant. Chronic STN stimulation allows to replace for dopaminergic medications in the long-term at the expense of all increase of the total energy delivered. This is associated with marked improvement of motor features without a matching benefit in functional measures. (C) 2008 Movement Disorder Society

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available