4.6 Article

Medical Decision-Making Capacity in Cognitively Impaired Parkinson's Disease Patients Without Dementia

Journal

MOVEMENT DISORDERS
Volume 23, Issue 13, Pages 1867-1874

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mds.22170

Keywords

consent capacity; medical decison-making; cognitive impairment without dementia; functional change; Parkinson's disease

Funding

  1. National Institute on Aging [1P50 AG16582, 1R01 Ag021927]
  2. UAB Department of Neuroloy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Little is currently known about the higher order functional skills of patients with Parkinson disease and cognitive impairment. Medical decision-making capacity (MDC) was assessed in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) with cognitive impairment and dementia. Participants were 16 patients with PD and cognitive impairment without dementia (PD-CIND). 16 patients with PD dementia (PDD) and 22 healthy older adults. All participants were administered the Capacity to Consent to Treatment Instrument (CCTI), a standardized capacity instrument assessing MDC under five different consent standards. Parametric and nonparametric statistical analyses were utilized to examine capacity performance on the consent standards. In addition, capacity outcomes (capable marginally capable, or incapable outcomes) on the standards were identified for the two patient groups. Relative to controls, PD-CIND patients demonstrated significant impairment on the understanding treatment consent standard clinically the most stringent CCTI standard. Relative to controls and PD-CIND patients. PDD patients were impaired on the three clinical standards of understanding reasoning, and appreciation. The findings suggest that impairment in decisional capacity is already present in cognitively impaired patients with PD without dementia and increases as these patients develop dementia. Clinicians and researchers should carefully assess decisional capacity in all patients with PD with cognitive impairment. (C) 2008 Movement Disorder Society.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available