3.9 Review

Role of Vascular Risk Factors and Vascular Dysfunction in Alzheimer's Disease

Journal

MOUNT SINAI JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Volume 77, Issue 1, Pages 82-102

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/msj.20155

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; apolipoprotein; blood-brain barrier; cholesterol; diabetes; hypertension; risk factors

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [AG05138, AG02219, AG10491]
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [R01NS075685] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [P50AG005138, P01AG010491, P01AG002219] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent findings indicate that vascular risk factors and neurovascular dysfunction play integral roles in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease, In addition to aging, the most common risk factors for Alzheimer's disease are apolipoprotein e4 allele, hypertension, hypotension, diabetes, and hypercholesterolemia. All of these can be characterized by vascular pathology attributed to conditions such as cerebral amyloid angiopathy and subsequent blood-brain barrier dysfunction. Many epidemiological, clinical, and pharmacotherapeutic studies have assessed the associations between such risk factors and Alzheimer's disease and have found positive associations between hypertension, hypotension, and diabetes mellitus. However, there are still many conflicting results from these population-based studies, and they should be interpreted carefully. Recognition of these factors and the mechanisms by which they contribute to Alzheimer's disease will be beneficial in the current treatment regimens for Alzheimer's disease and in the development of future therapies. Here we discuss vascular factors with respect to Alzheimer's disease and dementia and review the factors that give rise to vascular dysfunction and contribute to Alzheimer's disease. Mt Sinai J Med 77:82-102, 2010. (C) 2010 Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available