4.4 Article

A Numerical Study of Methods for Moist Atmospheric Flows: Compressible Equations

Journal

MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW
Volume 142, Issue 11, Pages 4269-4283

Publisher

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-13-00368.1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Applied Mathematics Program of the DOE Office of Advance Scientific Computing Research under U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  2. Scientific Discovery through Advanced Computing (SciDAC) program - U.S. Department of Energy Office of Advanced Scientific Computing Research
  3. Office of Biological and Environmental Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two common numerical techniques for integrating reversible moist processes in atmospheric flows are investigated in the context of solving the fully compressible Euler equations. The first is a one-step, coupled technique based on using appropriate invariant variables such that terms resulting from phase change are eliminated in the governing equations. In the second approach, which is a two-step scheme, separate transport equations for liquid water and water vapor are used, and no conversion between water vapor and liquid water is allowed in the first step, while in the second step a saturation adjustment procedure is performed that correctly allocates the water into its two phases based on the Clausius-Clapeyron formula. The numerical techniques described are first validated by comparing to a well-established benchmark problem. Particular attention is then paid to the effect of changing the time scale at which the moist variables are adjusted to the saturation requirements in two different variations of the two-step scheme. This study is motivated by the fact that when acoustic modes are integrated separately in time (neglecting phase change related phenomena), or when soundproof equations are integrated, the time scale for imposing saturation adjustment is typically much larger than the numerical one related to the acoustics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available