4.4 Article

A Comparison of South American and African Preferential Pathways for Extreme Cold Events

Journal

MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW
Volume 141, Issue 6, Pages 2066-2086

Publisher

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-12-00202.1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF [ATM9912075]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the Southern Hemisphere, a relatively well-known preferential pathway along which cold air surges equatorward is situated to the east of the Andes Mountains. In this study, a second preferred pathway is identified to the east of the African Highlands, with additional minor pathways identified east of the Brazilian Highlands and Madagascar. The primary objective of this study is to compare climatological and synoptic characteristics of extreme cold events (ECEs) along the Andes and African Highlands pathways. ECEs are defined as the top 1% coldest 925-hPa temperatures within the Andes and the African Highlands pathways using the 1977-2001 subset of the 2.5 degrees x 2.5 degrees 40-yr European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Re-Analysis (ERA-40). ECEs within the Andes and African Highlands pathways are associated with dynamically forced anticyclogenesis and have low-level characteristics that vary substantially. Along the Andes pathway, ECEs feature 925-hPa temperatures as much as 17 degrees C below normal, with 925-hPa southerly winds ranging from 0 to 10 m s(-1) and 925-700-hPa lapse rates as low as -3 degrees C km(-1). In contrast, ECEs along the African Highlands pathway feature 925-hPa temperatures up to 10 degrees C below normal, with 925-hPa southerly winds ranging from 5 to 15 m s(-1), and 925-700-hPa lapse rates generally between 28 and 5 degrees C km(-1). Composite analyses reveal that despite stronger southerly winds, ECEs along the African Highlands pathway are typically not as cold or stable as those along the Andes pathway because cold air from Antarctica must traverse a longer distance over water to reach Africa.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available