4.4 Article

Controlling the Computational Modes of the Arbitrarily Structured C Grid

Journal

MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW
Volume 140, Issue 10, Pages 3220-3234

Publisher

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-11-00221.1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCAS Climate
  2. NERC [NE/H002774/1, NE/H001166/1, NE/I022086/1]
  3. NERC [NE/H015698/1, NE/I022086/1, NE/H001166/1, NE/H002774/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/I022086/1, NE/H001166/1, ncas10009, NE/H015698/1, NE/H002774/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The arbitrarily structured C grid, Thuburn-Ringler-Skamarock-Klemp (TRiSK), is being used in the Model for Prediction Across Scales (MPAS) and is being considered by the Met Office for their next dynamical core. However, the hexagonal C grid supports a branch of spurious Rossby modes, which lead to erroneous grid-scale oscillations of potential vorticity (PV). It is shown how these modes can be harmlessly controlled by using upwind-biased interpolation schemes for PV. A number of existing advection schemes for PV are tested, including that used in MPAS, and none are found to give adequate results for all grids and all cases. Therefore a new scheme is proposed; continuous, linear-upwind stabilized transport (CLUST), a blend between centered and linear-upwind with the blend dependent on the flow direction with respect to the cell edge. A diagnostic of grid-scale oscillations is proposed that gives further discrimination between schemes than using potential enstrophy alone. Indeed, some schemes are found to destroy potential enstrophy while gridscale oscillations grow. CLUST performs well on hexagonal-icosahedral grids and unrotated skipped latitude longitude grids of the sphere for various shallow-water test cases. Despite the computational modes, the hexagonal icosahedral grid performs well since these modes are easy and harmless to filter. As a result, TRiSK appears to perform better than a spectral shallow-water model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available