4.4 Article

Implementation of a Nonlinear Subfilter Turbulence Stress Model for Large-Eddy Simulation in the Advanced Research WRF Model

Journal

MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW
Volume 138, Issue 11, Pages 4212-4228

Publisher

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/2010MWR3286.1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U S Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory [DE-AC52-07NA27344]
  2. LLNL [06-ERD-026, 09-ERD-038]
  3. LDRD

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two formulations of a nonlinear turbulence subfilter-scale (SFS) stress model were implemented into the Advanced Research Weather Research and Forecasting model (ARW-WRF) version 30 for improved large-eddy simulation performance The new models were evaluated against the WRF model's standard Smagorinsky and 1 5-order turbulence kinetic energy (TKE) linear eddy viscosity SFS stress models in simulations of geostroplucally forced, neutral boundary layer flow over both flat terrain and a shallow, symmetric transverse ridge Comparisons of simulation results with similarity profiles indicate that the nonlinear models significantly Improve agreement with the expected profiles near the surface reducing the overprediction of near surface stress characteristic of linear eddy-viscosity models with no near wall damping Comparisons of simulations conducted using different mesh sizes Indicate that the nonlinear model simulations at coarser resolutions agree more closely with the higher-resolution results than corresponding lower-resolution simulations using the standard WRF SFS stress models The nonlinear models produced flows featuring a broader range of eddy sizes with less spectral power at lower frequencies and more spectral power at higher frequencies In simulated flow over the transverse ridge, distributions of flow separation and reversal near the surface simulated at higher resolution were likewise better depicted in coarser resolution simulations using the nonlinear models

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available