4.7 Article

Cosmological simulations for combined-probe analyses: covariance and neighbour-exclusion bias

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 481, Issue 1, Pages 1337-1367

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty2319

Keywords

gravitational lensing: weak; methods: numerical; dark matter; large-scale structure of Universe

Funding

  1. European Commission under a Marie-Sklodowska-Curie European Fellowship (EU) [656869]
  2. European Research Council [647112]
  3. LSSTC Data Science Fellowship
  4. Higgs Centre Nimmo Scholarship
  5. Edinburgh Global Research Scholarship
  6. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) Vici [639.043.512]
  7. German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi) via DLR [50QE1103]
  8. NSERC of Canada
  9. Emmy Noether grant of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [Hi 1495/2-1]
  10. STFC [ST/N000919/1]
  11. Canada Foundation for Innovation under Compute Canada
  12. Government of Ontario
  13. Ontario Research Fund - Research Excellence
  14. University of Toronto
  15. La Silla Paranal Observatory [177.A-3016, 177.A-3017, 177.A-3018]
  16. STFC (UK)
  17. ARC (Australia)
  18. AAO
  19. ESO [177.A-3016]
  20. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  21. National Science Foundation
  22. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science
  23. University of Arizona
  24. Brazilian Participation Group
  25. Brookhaven National Laboratory
  26. Carnegie Mellon University
  27. University of Florida
  28. French Participation Group
  29. German Participation Group
  30. Harvard University
  31. Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias
  32. Michigan State/Notre Dame/JINA Participation Group
  33. Johns Hopkins University
  34. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  35. Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics
  36. Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics
  37. New Mexico State University
  38. New York University
  39. Ohio State University
  40. Pennsylvania State University
  41. University of Portsmouth
  42. Princeton University
  43. Spanish Participation Group
  44. University of Tokyo
  45. University of Utah
  46. Vanderbilt University
  47. University of Virginia
  48. University of Washington
  49. Yale University
  50. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [656869] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)
  51. STFC [ST/N000919/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a public suite of weak-lensing mock data, extending the Scinet Light Cone Simulations (SLICS) to simulate cross-correlation analyses with different cosmological probes. These mocks include Kilo Degree Survey (KiDS)-450- and LSST-like lensing data, cosmic microwave background lensing maps and simulated spectroscopic surveys that emulate the Galaxy And Mass Assembly, BOSS, and 2-degree Field Lensing galaxy surveys. With 844 independent realizations, our mocks are optimized for combined-probe covariance estimation, which we illustrate for the case of a joint measurement involving cosmic shear, galaxy-galaxy lensing, and galaxy clustering from KiDS-450 and BOSS data. With their high spatial resolution, the SLICS are also optimal for predicting the signal for novel lensing estimators, for the validation of analysis pipelines, and for testing a range of systematic effects such as the impact of neighbour-exclusion bias on the measured tomographic cosmic shear signal. For surveys like KiDS and Dark Energy Survey, where the rejection of neighbouring galaxies occurs within similar to 2 arcsec, we show that the measured cosmic shear signal will be biased low, but by less than a per cent on the angular scales that are typically used in cosmic shear analyses. The amplitude of the neighbour-exclusion bias doubles in deeper, LSST-like data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available