4.7 Article

KiDS-450: enhancing cosmic shear with clipping transformations

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 480, Issue 4, Pages 5529-5549

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty2271

Keywords

gravitational lensing: weak; cosmological parameters; surveys; cosmology: observations

Funding

  1. European Research Council [647112]
  2. European Commission under a Marie-Sklodwoska-Curie European Fellowship (EU project) [656869]
  3. NSERC of Canada
  4. Emmy Noether grant of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [Hi 1495/2-1]
  5. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  6. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [TR33]
  7. European Union [797794]
  8. ESO Telescopes at the La Silla Paranal Observatory [177.A-3016, 177.A-3017, 177.A-3018]
  9. Canada Foundation for Innovation under the Compute Canada
  10. Government of Ontario
  11. Ontario Research Fund - Research Excellence
  12. University of Toronto
  13. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [797794] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)
  14. STFC [ST/M001334/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the first 'clipped' cosmic shear measurement using data from the Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS-450). 'Clipping' transformations suppress the signal from the highest density, non-linear regions of cosmological fields. We demonstrate that these transformations improve constraints on S-8 = sigma(8)(Omega(m)/0.3)(0.5) when used in combination with conventional two-point statistics. For the KiDS-450 data, we find that the combined measurements improve the constraints on S-8 by 17 per cent, compared to shear correlation functions alone. We determine the expectation value of the clipped shear correlation function using a suite of numerical simulations, and develop methodology to mitigate the impact of masking and shot noise. Future improvements in numerical simulations and mass reconstruction methodology will permit the precise calibration of clipped cosmic shear statistics such that clipping can become a standard tool in weak-lensing analyses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available