4.7 Article

Joint analysis of the thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect and 2MASS galaxies: probing gas physics in the local Universe and beyond

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 480, Issue 3, Pages 3928-3941

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty2031

Keywords

galaxies: clusters: general; galaxies: clusters: intracluster medium; cosmic background radiation; cosmological parameters; cosmology: theory

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [JP15H05896]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a first joint analysis of the power spectra of the thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich (tSZ) effect measured by the Planck and the number density fluctuations of galaxies in the 2MASS (Two Micron All Sky Survey) redshift survey (2MRS) catalogue, including their cross-correlation. Combining these measurements with the cosmic microwave background (CMB) data and CMB lensing of Planck assuming a flat A cold dark matter (ACDM) model, we constrain the mass bias parameter as B = 1.54 +/- 0.098(1 sigma) [(1 - b) = 0.649 +/- 0.041, where (1 - b) (math) B-1], i.e. the Planck cluster mass should be 35 per cent lower than the true mass. The mass bias determined by the 2MRS-tSZ cross-power spectrum alone is consistent with that determined by the tSZ autopower spectrum alone, suggesting that this large mass bias is not due to obvious systematics in the tSZ data. We find that the 2MRS-tSZ cross-power spectrum is more sensitive to less massive haloes than the tSZ autopower spectrum and it significantly improves a constraint on the mass dependence of the mass bias. The redshift dependence is not strongly constrained since the multipole range in which high redshift clusters mainly contribute to the tSZ auto is dominated by the contaminating sources. We conclude that no strong mass or redshift evolution of the mass bias is needed to explain the data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available