4.7 Article

Rapidly evolving transients in the Dark Energy Survey

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 481, Issue 1, Pages 894-917

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty2309

Keywords

supernovae: general

Funding

  1. EU/FP7-ERC [615929]
  2. ESO Science Archive Facility [097.D-0709]
  3. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for All-sky Astrophysics (CAASTRO) [CE110001020]
  4. U.S. Department of Energy
  5. U.S. National Science Foundation
  6. Ministry of Science and Education of Spain
  7. Science and Technology Facilities Council of the United Kingdom
  8. Higher Education Funding Council for England
  9. National Center for Supercomputing Applications at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  10. Kavli Institute of Cosmological Physics at the University of Chicago
  11. Center for Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics at the Ohio State University
  12. Mitchell Institute for Fundamental Physics and Astronomy at Texas AM University
  13. Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos
  14. Fundacao Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
  15. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico
  16. Ministerio da Ciencia, Tecnologia e Inovacao
  17. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  18. Collaborating Institutions in the Dark Energy Survey
  19. National Science Foundation [AST-1138766, AST-1536171]
  20. MINECO [AYA2015-71825, ESP2015-66861, FPA2015-68048, SEV-2016-0588, SEV-2016-0597, MDM-2015-0509]
  21. ERDF funds from the European Union
  22. CERCA program of the Generalitat de Catalunya
  23. European Research Council under the European Union' [240672, 291329, 306478]
  24. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for All-sky Astrophysics (CAAS-TRO) [CE110001020]
  25. Brazilian Instituto Nacional de Ciencia e Tecnologia (INCT) e-Universe (CNPq) [465376/2014-2]
  26. UK Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) [ST/P000398/1]
  27. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of High Energy Physics [DE-AC02-07CH11359]
  28. STFC [ST/K00090X/1, ST/F002335/1, ST/I001204/1, ST/J005428/1, ST/K006797/1, ST/M007030/1, ST/L005573/1, ST/P000398/1, ST/M002853/1, ST/M001334/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  29. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1720756] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  30. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [1720756] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the results of a search for rapidly evolving transients in the Dark Energy Survey Supernova Programme. These events are characterized by fast light-curve evolution (rise to peak in less than or similar to 10 d and exponential decline in less than or similar to 30 d after peak). We discovered 72 events, including 37 transients with a spectroscopic redshift from host galaxy spectral features. The 37 events increase the total number of rapid optical transients by more than a factor of two. They are found at a wide range of redshifts (0.05 < z < 1.56) and peak brightnesses (-15.75 > M-g > -22.25). The multiband photometry is well fit by a blackbody up to few weeks after peak. The events appear to be hot (T approximate to 10 000-30 000 K) and large (R approximate to 10(14) -2 x 10(15) cm) at peak, and generally expand and cool in time, though some events show evidence for a receding photosphere with roughly constant temperature. Spectra taken around peak are dominated by a blue featureless continuum consistent with hot, optically thick ejecta. We compare our events with a previously suggested physical scenario involving shock breakout in an optically thick wind surrounding a core-collapse supernova, we conclude that current models for such a scenario might need an additional power source to describe the exponential decline. We find that these transients tend to favour star-forming host galaxies, which could be consistent with a core-collapse origin. However, more detailed modelling of the light curves is necessary to determine their physical origin.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available