4.7 Article

NuSTAR observations of Mrk 766: distinguishing reflection from absorption

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 480, Issue 3, Pages 3689-3701

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty2081

Keywords

accretion, accretion discs; black hole physics; galaxies: individual: Mrk 766; galaxies: Seyfert

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC)
  2. ERC Advanced Grant FEEDBACK [340442]
  3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  4. ESA Member States
  5. NASA
  6. Faculty of the European Space Astronomy Centre (ESAC)
  7. STFC [ST/N004027/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present two new NuSTAR observations of the narrow-line Seyfert 1 (NLS1) galaxy Mrk 766 and give constraints on the two scenarios previously proposed to explain its spectrum and that of other NLS ls: relativistic reflection and partial covering. The NuSTAR spectra show a strong hard (>15 keV) X-ray excess, while simultaneous soft X-ray coverage of one of the observations provided by XMM-Newton constrains the ionized absorption in the source. The pure reflection model requires a black hole of high spin (a > 0.92) viewed at a moderate inclination (i = 46(-4)(-1)degrees). The pure partial covering model requires extreme parameters: the cut-off of the primary continuum is very low (22(-5)(+7) keV) in one observation and the intrinsic X-ray emission must provide a large fraction (75 per cent) of the bolometric luminosity. Allowing a hybrid model with both partial covering and reflection provides more reasonable absorption parameters and relaxes the constraints on reflection parameters. The fractional variability reduces around the iron K band and at high energies including the Compton hump, suggesting that the reflected emission is less variable than the continuum.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available