4.7 Article

Survival of non-coplanar, closely packed planetary systems after a close encounter

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 481, Issue 2, Pages 2205-2212

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty2418

Keywords

methods: numerical; planets and satellites: dynamical evolution and stability

Funding

  1. College of Sciences at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas
  2. Center For Interdisciplinary Exploration and Research in Astrophysics (CIERA) at Northwestern University
  3. NASA [NNX16AK32G, NNX16AK08G]
  4. WCAS Undergraduate Research Grant Program
  5. Quest high performance computing facility at Northwestern University
  6. NASA [901801, 902845, NNX16AK32G, NNX16AK08G] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Planetary systems with more than two bodies will experience orbital crossings at a time related to the initial orbital separations of the planets. After a crossing, the system enters a period of chaotic evolution ending in the reshaping of the system's architecture via planetary collisions or ejections. We carry out N-body integrations on a large number of systems with equally spaced planets (in units of the Hill radius) to determine the distribution of instability times for a given planet separation. We investigate both the time to the initiation of instability through a close encounter and the time to a planet-planet collision. We find that a significant portion of systems with non-zero mutual inclinations survive after a close encounter and do not promptly experience a planet-planet collision. Systems with significant inclinations can continue to evolve for over 1000 times longer than the encounter time. The fraction of long-lived systems is dependent on the absolute system scale and the initial inclination of the planets. These results have implications to the assumed stability of observed planetary systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available