4.7 Article

Effects of non-Kozai mutual inclinations on two-planet system stability through all phases of stellar evolution

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 481, Issue 2, Pages 2180-2188

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty2409

Keywords

methods: numerical; celestial mechanics; minor planets, asteroids: general; planets and satellites: dynamical evolution and stability; stars: AGB and post-AGB; white dwarfs

Funding

  1. STFC via an Ernest Rutherford Fellowship [ST/P003850/1]
  2. European Research Council under the European Union [320964]
  3. STFC [ST/P003850/1, ST/P000495/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

( )previous full-lifetime simulations of single-star multi-planet systems across all phases of stellar evolution have predominately assumed coplanar or nearly coplanar orbits. Here we assess the consequences of this assumption by removing it and exploring the effect of giant branch mass loss on the stability of two-planet systems with small to moderate non-Kozai (<40 degrees) relative inclinations. We run nearly 10(4) simulations over 14 Gyr for F-star, A-star and B-star planet hosts, incorporating main-sequence stellar masses of 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0 and 5.0 solar masses, and initial planetary semimajor axis ratios that straddle their three-dimensional Hill stability limits. We find that the near-coplanar assumption can approximate well the stability frequencies and critical separations found for higher inclinations, except around strong meanmotion commensurabilities. Late instabilities - after the star has become a white dwarf- occur throughout the explored mutual inclination range. Consequently, non-Kozai mutual inclination should not be used as a predictive orbital proxy for determining which white dwarf multi-planet systems discovered by Gaia should represent high-priority follow-up targets for the detection of metal pollution and planetary debris discs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available