4.7 Article

CNO abundances in the globular clusters NGC 1851 and NGC 6752

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 446, Issue 4, Pages 3319-3329

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu2334

Keywords

Stars: abundances; Galaxy: abundances; globular clusters: individual: NGC 1851; globular clusters: individual: NGC 6752

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [DP0984924, DP120101237]
  2. Danish National Research Foundation
  3. ASTERISK project (ASTERoseismic Investigations with SONG and Kepler) - European Research Council [267864]
  4. Australian Research Council [DP0984924] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We measure the C+N+O abundance sum in red giant stars in two Galactic globular clusters, NGC 1851 and NGC 6752. NGC 1851 has a split subgiant branch which could be due to different ages or C+N+O content while NGC 6752 is representative of the least complex globular clusters. For NGC 1851 and NGC 6752, we obtain average values of A(C+N+O) = 8.16 +/- 0.10 (sigma = 0.34) and 7.62 +/- 0.02 (sigma = 0.06), respectively. When taking into account the measurement errors, we find a constant C+N+O abundance sum in NGC 6752. The C+N+O abundance dispersion is only 0.06 dex, and such a result requires that the source of the light element abundance variations does not increase the C+N+O sum in this cluster. For NGC 1851, we confirm a large spread in C+N+O. In this cluster, the anomalous RGB has a higher C+N+O content than the canonical RGB by a factor of 4 (similar to 0.6 dex). This result lends further support to the idea that the two subgiant branches in NGC 1851 are roughly coeval, but with different CNO abundances.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available