4.7 Article

Seeing in the dark - II. Cosmic shear in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 440, Issue 2, Pages 1322-1344

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu145

Keywords

gravitational lensing: weak; surveys; cosmology: observations

Funding

  1. US Department of Energy's Office of High Energy Physics [DE-AC02-05CH11231, DE-FG03-02-ER40701, DE-SC0006624]
  2. US National Science Foundation [AST-0807337]
  3. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  4. David & Lucile Packard Foundation
  5. NASA [HST-HF-01199.02-A, NAS 5-26555, 08-ADP08-0019]
  6. Space Telescope Science Institute
  7. DOE
  8. Swiss National Foundation [200021-116696/1]
  9. WCU [R32-10130]
  10. NSF [AST-0607701, 0908246, 0908442, 0908354, 1135622, AST95-09298, AST-0071048, AST-0071198, AST-0507428, AST-0507483]
  11. NASA LTSA [NNG04GC89G]
  12. W. M. Keck Foundation
  13. National Science Foundation
  14. US Department of Energy
  15. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  16. Japanese Monbukagakusho
  17. Max Planck Society
  18. Higher Education Funding Council for England
  19. American Museum of Natural History
  20. Astrophysical Institute Potsdam
  21. University of Basel
  22. University of Cambridge
  23. Case Western Reserve University
  24. University of Chicago
  25. Drexel University
  26. Fermilab
  27. Institute for Advanced Study
  28. Japan Participation Group
  29. Johns Hopkins University
  30. Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics
  31. Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology
  32. Korean Scientist Group
  33. Chinese Academy of Sciences (LAMOST)
  34. Los Alamos National Laboratory
  35. Max-Planck-Institute for Astronomy (MPIA)
  36. Max-Planck-Institute for Astrophysics (MPA)
  37. New Mexico State University
  38. Ohio State University
  39. University of Pittsburgh
  40. University of Portsmouth
  41. Princeton University
  42. United States Naval Observatory
  43. University of Washington
  44. Division Of Physics
  45. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1135622] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  46. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0006624] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Statistical weak lensing by large-scale structure - cosmic shear - is a promising cosmological tool, which has motivated the design of several large upcoming surveys. Here, we present a measurement of cosmic shear using co-added Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) imaging in 168 square degrees of the equatorial region, with r < 23.5 and i < 22.5, a source number density of 2.2 per arcmin(2) and mean redshift of z(med) = 0.52. These co-adds were generated using a new method described in the companion Paper I that was intended to minimize systematic errors in the lensing measurement due to coherent point spread function anisotropies that are otherwise prevalent in the SDSS imaging data. We present measurements of cosmic shear out to angular separations of 2 degrees, along with systematics tests that (combined with those from Paper I on the catalogue generation) demonstrate that our results are dominated by statistical rather than systematic errors. Assuming a cosmological model corresponding to Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe 7(WMAP7) and allowing only the amplitude of matter fluctuations sigma(8) to vary, we find a best-fitting value of sigma(8)=0.636(-0.154)(+0.109) (1 sigma); without systematic errors this would be sigma(8)=0.636(-0.137)(+0.099) (1 sigma). Assuming a flat Lambda cold dark matter model, the combined constraints with WMAP7 are sigma(8)=0.784(-0.026)(+0.028)(1 sigma)(-0.054)(+0.055)(2 sigma) and Omega(m)h(2)=0.1303(-0.0048)(+0.0047)(1 sigma)(-0.009)(+0.009)(2 sigma); the 2 sigma error ranges are, respectively, 14 and 17 per cent smaller than WMAP7 alone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available