4.7 Article

Early flattening of dark matter cusps in dwarf spheroidal galaxies

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 446, Issue 2, Pages 1820-1828

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu2217

Keywords

instabilities; galaxies: dwarf; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: formation; dark matter

Funding

  1. PRIN MIUR, project 'The Chemical and Dynamical Evolution of the Milky Way and Local Group Galaxies' [prot. 2010LY5N2T]
  2. STFC [R22138/GA001, ST/K00106X/1]
  3. European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) / ERC [321067]
  4. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/J00149X/1, ST/K00106X/1, PP/D001242/1, ST/G002479/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. STFC [ST/G002479/1, ST/K00106X/1, ST/J00149X/1, PP/D001242/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Simulations of the clustering of cold dark matter yield dark matter haloes that have central density cusps, but observations of totally dark-matter-dominated dwarf spheroidal galaxies imply that they do not have cuspy central density profiles. We use analytic calculations and numerical modelling to argue that whenever stars form, central density cusps are likely to be erased. Gas that accumulates in the potential well of an initially cuspy dark matter halo settles into a disc. Eventually the surface density of the gas exceeds the threshold for fragmentation into self-gravitating clouds. The clouds are massive enough to transfer energy to the dark matter particles via dynamical friction on a short time-scale. The halo's central cusp is heated to form a core with central logarithmic density slope gamma approximate to 0 before stellar feedback makes its impact. Since star formation is an inefficient process, the clouds are disrupted by feedback when only a small fraction of their mass has been converted to stars, and the dark matter dominates the final mass distribution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available