4.7 Article

Axisymmetric equilibrium models for magnetized neutron stars in General Relativity under the Conformally Flat Condition

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 439, Issue 4, Pages 3541-3563

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu215

Keywords

gravitation; magnetic fields; MHD; stars: magnetars; stars: neutron

Funding

  1. EU FP7-CIG grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Extremely magnetized neutron stars with magnetic fields as strong as similar to 10(15-16) G, or magnetars, have received considerable attention in the last decade due to their identification as a plausible source for Soft Gamma Repeaters and Anomalous X-ray Pulsars. Moreover, this class of compact objects has been proposed as a possible engine capable of powering both Long and Short Gamma-Ray Bursts, if the rotation period in their formation stage is short enough (similar to 1 ms). Such strong fields are expected to induce substantial deformations of the star and thus to produce the emission of gravitational waves. Here we investigate, by means of numerical modelling, axisymmetric static equilibria of polytropic and strongly magnetized stars in full general relativity, within the ideal magneto-hydrodynamic regime. The eXtended Conformally Flat Condition (XCFC) for the metric is assumed, allowing us to employ the techniques introduced for the X-ECHO code, proven to be accurate, efficient, and stable. The updated XNS code for magnetized neutron star equilibria is made publicly available for the community (see ext-link-type=uri xlink:href=http://www.arcetri.astro.it/science/ahead/XNS xmlns:xlink=http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink>www.arcetri.astro.it/science/ahead/XNS). Several sequences of models are here retrieved, from the purely toroidal (resolving a controversy in the literature) or poloidal cases, to the so-called twisted torus mixed configurations, expected to be dynamically stable, which are solved for the first time in the non-perturbative regime.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available