4.7 Article

Nuclear coups: dynamics of black holes in galaxy mergers

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 439, Issue 1, Pages 474-487

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu024

Keywords

galaxies: active; galaxies: interactions; galaxies: nuclei

Funding

  1. NASA [ATP NNX10AC84G]
  2. SAO [TM1-12007X]
  3. NSF [AST 1107675]
  4. Marie Curie Career Integration grant [PCIG10-GA-2011-303609]
  5. National Science Foundation through the Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics [NSF PHY11-25915]
  6. National Science Foundation through program 'A Universe of Black Holes' [NSF PHY11-25915]
  7. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  8. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [1107675] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We study the dynamical evolution of supermassive black holes (BHs) in merging galaxies on scales of hundreds of kpc to 10 pc, to identify the physical processes that aid or hinder the orbital decay of BHs. We present hydrodynamical simulations of galaxy mergers with a resolution of <= 20 pc, chosen to accurately track the motion of the nuclei and provide a realistic environment for the evolution of the BHs. We find that, during the late stages of the merger, tidal shocks inject energy in the nuclei, causing one or both nuclei to be disrupted and leaving their BH 'naked', without any bound gas or stars. In many cases, the nucleus that is ultimately disrupted is that of the larger galaxy ('nuclear coup'), as star formation grows a denser nuclear cusp in the smaller galaxy. We supplement our simulations with an analytical estimate of the orbital-decay time required for the BHs to form a binary at unresolved scales, due to dynamical friction. We find that, when a nuclear coup occurs, the time-scale is much shorter than when the secondary's nucleus is disrupted, as the infalling BH is more massive, and it also finds itself in a denser stellar environment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available