4.7 Article

On the dark matter profile in Sculptor: breaking the β degeneracy with Virial shape parameters

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 441, Issue 2, Pages 1584-1600

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu691

Keywords

galaxies: dwarf; galaxies: kinematics and dynamics; dark matter

Funding

  1. KCL Graduate School
  2. STFC
  3. STFC [ST/J002798/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/J002798/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a new method for studying tracers in gravitational systems where higher moments of the line-of-sight velocity distribution are introduced via Virial equations rather than the Jeans equations. Unlike the fourth-order Jeans equations, the fourth-order Virial equations can simply be added to the standard second-order Jeans equation without introducing a new anisotropy parameter beta('). We introduce two new global shape parameters zeta(A) and zeta(B) which replace the kurtosis as a more statistically robust measure of the shape of the line-of-sight velocity distribution. We show that in the case of stars in dwarf spheroidal galaxies these new parameters can significantly reduce the range of density profiles that are otherwise consistent with the observed stellar kinematics (a problem sometimes known as the beta degeneracy). Specifically, we find that zeta(A) focuses tightly on a sub-set of solutions where cusped density profiles are degenerate with more concentrated cored dark matter haloes. If the number density of stars nu(r) is fixed, then introducing zeta(B) can further reduce the space of solutions by constraining the outer slope of the dark matter density profile. Assuming a Plummer profile for nu(r), we recover the surprising result that the dark matter in Sculptor may be cuspy after all, in contrast to the conclusions of other approaches.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available