4.7 Article

3-mm spectral line survey of two lines of sight towards two typical cloud complexes in the Galactic Centre

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 446, Issue 4, Pages 3842-3862

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu2271

Keywords

ISM: abundances; ISM: clouds; ISM: molecules; Galaxy: centre

Funding

  1. MICINN [AYA2010-21697-C05-01, FIS2012-39162-C06-01]
  2. Astro-Madrid [CAM S2009/ESP-1496]
  3. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [ESP2013-47809-C3-1-R]
  4. Marie Curie Actions of the European Commission (FP7-COFUND)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the results of two Mopra 3-mm spectral line surveys of the lines of sight (LOS) towards the Galactic Centre (GC) molecular complexes Sgr B2 (LOS+0.693) and Sgr A (LOS-0.11). The spectra covered the frequency ranges of similar to 77-93 GHz and similar to 105-113 GHz. We have detected 38 molecular species and 25 isotopologues. The isotopic ratios derived from column density ratios are consistent with the canonical values, indicating that chemical isotopic fractionation and/or selective photodissociation can be considered negligible (<10 per cent) for the GC physical conditions. The derived abundances and rotational temperatures are very similar for both LOSs, indicating very similar chemical and excitation conditions for the molecular gas in the GC. The excitation conditions are also very similar to those found for the nucleus of the starburst galaxy NGC 253. We report for the first time the detection of HCO and HOC+ emission in LOS+0.693. Our comparison of the abundance ratios between CS, HCO, HOC+ and HCO+ found in the two LOSs with those in typical Galactic photodissociation regions (PDRs) and starbursts galaxies does not show any clear trend to distinguish between ultraviolet-and X-ray-induced chemistries. We propose that the CS/HOC+ ratio could be used as a tracer of the PDR components in the molecular clouds in the nuclei of galaxies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available