4.7 Article

Ultimate age-dating method for galaxy groups; clues from the Millennium Simulations

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 442, Issue 2, Pages 1578-1585

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu963

Keywords

galaxies: evolution; galaxies: formation; galaxies: groups: general; galaxies: structure

Funding

  1. STFC [ST/K000845/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/K000845/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There have been a number of studies dedicated to identification of fossil galaxy groups, arguably groups with a relatively old formation epoch. Most of such studies identify fossil groups, primarily based on a large luminosity gap, which is the magnitude gap between the two most luminous galaxies in the group. Studies of these types of groups in the millennium cosmological simulations show that, although they have accumulated a significant fraction of their mass, relatively earlier than groups with a small luminosity gap, this parameter alone is not highly efficient in fully discriminating between the 'old' and 'young' galaxy groups, a label assigned based on halo mass accumulation history. We study galaxies drawn from the semi-analytic models of Guo et al., based on the Millennium Simulation. We establish a set of four observationally measurable parameters which can be used in combination, to identify a subset of galaxy groups which are old, with a very high probability. We thus argue that a sample of fossil groups selected based on luminosity gap will result in a contaminated sample of old galaxy groups. By adding constraints on the luminosity of the brightest galaxy, and its offset from the group luminosity centroid, we can considerably improve the age dating.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available