4.7 Article

Ambient magnetic field amplification in shock fronts of relativistic jets: an application to GRB afterglows

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 446, Issue 1, Pages 104-119

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu2104

Keywords

shock waves; methods: numerical; gamma-ray burst: general; ISM jets and outflows; ISM: magnetic fields

Funding

  1. CNPQ [300382/2008-1, 306598/2009-4]
  2. European Research Council [ADG-2011 ECOGAL]
  3. CAPES [3400-13-1]
  4. FAPESP [2011/12909-8, 2009/50053-8, 2011/51275-4, 2013/04073-2, 2013/18815-0, 2006/50654-3, 2009/54006-4]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Strong downstream magnetic fields of the order of similar to 1G, with large correlation lengths, are believed to cause the large synchrotron emission at the afterglow phase of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). Despite the recent theoretical efforts, models have failed to fully explain the amplification of the magnetic field, particularly in a matter-dominated scenario. We revisit the problem by considering the synchrotron emission to occur at the expanding shock front of a weakly magnetized relativistic jet over a magnetized surrounding medium. Analytical estimates and a number of high-resolution 2D relativistic magnetohydrodynamical (RMHD) simulations are provided. Jet opening angles of theta = 0 degrees-20 degrees, and ambient to jet density ratios of 10(-4)-10(2) were considered. We found that most of the amplification is due to compression of the ambient magnetic field at the contact discontinuity between the reverse and forward shocks at the jet head, with substantial pile-up of the magnetic field lines as the jet propagates sweeping the ambient field lines. The pile-up is maximum for theta -> 0, decreasing with theta, but larger than in the spherical blast problem. Values obtained for certain models are able to explain the observed intensities. The maximum correlation lengths found for such strong fields is of l(corr) <= 10(14) cm, 2-6 orders of magnitude larger than the found in previous works.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available