4.7 Article

Cluster magnification and the mass-richness relation in CFHTLenS

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 439, Issue 4, Pages 3755-3764

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu225

Keywords

gravitational lensing: weak; galaxies: clusters: general; galaxies: photometry; dark matter

Funding

  1. Canadian Space Agency
  2. UBC Four-Year-Fellowship
  3. NSERC
  4. Marie Curie IOF [252760]
  5. CITA National Fellowship
  6. DFG [Hi 1495/2-1]
  7. CIfAR

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gravitational lensing magnification is measured with a significance of 9.7 Sigma on a large sample of galaxy clusters in the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope Lensing Survey (CFHTLenS). This survey covers similar to 154 deg(2) and contains over 18 000 cluster candidates at redshifts 0.2 < z < 0.9, detected using the 3D-Matched Filter cluster-finder of Milkeraitis et al. We fit composite-NFW models to the ensemble, accounting for cluster miscentring, source-lens redshift overlap, as well as nearby structure (the two-halo term), and recover mass estimates of the cluster dark matter haloes in range of similar to 10(13) M-circle dot to 2 x 10(14) M-circle dot. Cluster richness is measured for the entire sample, and we bin the clusters according to both richness and redshift. A mass-richness relation M-200 = M-0(N-200/20)(beta) is fit to the measurements. For two different cluster miscentring models, we find consistent results for the normalization and slope, M-0 = (2.3 +/- 0.2) x 10(13) M-circle dot, beta = 1.4 +/- 0.1 and M-0 = (2.2 +/- 0.2) x 10(13) M-circle dot, beta = 1.5 +/- 0.1. We find that accounting for the full redshift distribution of lenses and sources is important, since any overlap can have an impact on mass estimates inferred from flux magnification.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available