4.7 Article

The dark matter of galaxy voids

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 438, Issue 4, Pages 3177-3187

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt2425

Keywords

large-scale structure of Universe

Funding

  1. NSF [AST-0908902, AST-0708849, AST-1009505]
  2. ANR Chaire d'Excellence
  3. UPMC Chaire Internationale in Theoretical Cosmology
  4. CITA National Fellowship
  5. Government of Canada
  6. Government of Canada through Industry Canada
  7. Province of Ontario through the Ministry of Research and Innovation
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  9. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [1009505] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

How do observed voids relate to the underlying dark matter distribution? To examine the spatial distribution of dark matter contained within voids identified in galaxy surveys, we apply Halo Occupation Distribution models representing sparsely and densely sampled galaxy surveys to a high-resolution N-body simulation. We compare these galaxy voids to voids found in the halo distribution, low-resolution dark matter and high-resolution dark matter. We find that voids at all scales in densely sampled surveys - and medium- to large-scale voids in sparse surveys - trace the same underdensities as dark matter, but they are larger in radius by similar to 20 per cent, they have somewhat shallower density profiles and they have centres offset by similar to 0.4R(v) rms. However, in void-to-void comparison we find that shape estimators are less robust to sampling, and the largest voids in sparsely sampled surveys suffer fragmentation at their edges. We find that voids in galaxy surveys always correspond to underdensities in the dark matter, though the centres may be offset. When this offset is taken into account, we recover almost identical radial density profiles between galaxies and dark matter. All mock catalogues used in this work are available at http://www.cosmicvoids.net.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available