4.7 Article

A volume-limited sample of X-ray galaxy groups and clusters - II. X-ray cavity dynamics

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 444, Issue 2, Pages 1236-1259

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu1499

Keywords

galaxies: clusters: general; X-rays: galaxies: clusters

Funding

  1. STFC
  2. NASA [PF2-130094]
  3. STFC [ST/J500975/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/J500975/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the results of our study of a volume-limited sample (z <= 0.071) of 101 X-ray galaxy groups and clusters, in which we explore the X-ray cavity energetics. Out of the 101 sources in our parent sample, X-ray cavities are found in 30 of them, all of which have a central cooling time of <= 3 Gyr. New X-ray cavities are detected in three sources. We focus on the subset of sources that have a central cooling time of <= 3 Gyr, whose active galactic nucleus (AGN) duty cycle is similar or equal to 61 per cent (30/49). This rises to >80 per cent for a central cooling time of <= 0.5 Gyr. When projection effects and central radio source detection rates are considered, the actual duty cycle is probably much higher. In addition, we show that data quality strongly affects the detection rates of X-ray cavities. After calculating the cooling luminosity and cavity powers of each source with cavities, it is evident that the bubbling process induced by the central AGN has to be, on average, continuous, to offset cooling. We find that the radius of the cavities, r, loosely depends on the ambient gas temperature as r proportional to T-0.5, above about 1.5 keV, with much more scatter below that temperature. Finally, we show that, at a given location in a group or cluster, larger bubbles travel faster than smaller ones. This means that the bubbles seen at larger distances from cluster cores could be the result of the merging of several smaller bubbles, produced in separate AGN cycles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available