4.7 Article

A search for flares and mass ejections on young late-type stars in the open cluster Blanco-1a

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 443, Issue 1, Pages 898-910

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu1161

Keywords

stars: activity; stars: flare; stars: late-type; open clusters and associations: individual: Blanco-1

Funding

  1. FWF [P22950-N16]
  2. European Commission
  3. FWF NFN [S116, S116 606-N16, S116607-N16]
  4. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P 22950] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P22950, S116] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a search for stellar activity (flares and mass ejections) in a sample of 28 stars in the young open cluster Blanco-1. We use optical spectra obtained with European Southern Observatory's Visible Multi-Object Spectrograph installed on the Very Large Telescope. From the total observing time of similar to 5 h, we find four H alpha flares but no distinct indication of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) on the investigated dK-dM stars. Two flares show 'dips' in their light curves right before their impulsive phases which are similar to previous discoveries in photometric light curves of active dMe stars. We estimate an upper limit of < 4 CMEs per day per star and discuss this result with respect to a empirical estimation of the CME rate of main-sequence stars. We find that we should have detected at least one CME per star with a mass of a parts per thousand currency sign 3 x 10(17) g depending on the star's X-ray luminosity, but the estimated H alpha fluxes associated with these masses are below the detection limit of our observations. We conclude that the parameter which mainly influences the detection of stellar CMEs using the method of Doppler-shifted emission caused by moving plasma is not the spectral resolution/velocity but the flux/mass of the CME.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available