4.7 Article

The role of major mergers in the size growth of intermediate-mass spheroids

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 443, Issue 2, Pages 1861-1866

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu1220

Keywords

galaxies: elliptical and lenticular, cD; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: formation; galaxies: high-redshift; galaxies: interactions

Funding

  1. Worcester College, Oxford
  2. NASA [11359, NAS 5-26555]
  3. STScI [GO-11359]
  4. NASA JWST Interdisciplinary Scientist grant from GSFC [NAG5-12460]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We study of the role of 'major' mergers (mass ratios > 1: 4) in driving size growth in high-redshift (1 < z < 2) spheroidal galaxies (SGs) with stellar masses between 10(9.5) and 10(10.7) M-circle dot. This is a largely unexplored mass range at this epoch, containing the progenitors of more massive SGs on which the bulk of the size-evolution literature is based. We visually split our SGs into systems that are relaxed and those that exhibit tidal features indicative of a recent merger. Numerical simulations indicate that, given the depth of our images, only tidal features due to major mergers will be detectable at these epochs (features from minor mergers being too faint), making the disturbed SGs a useful route to estimating major-merger-driven size growth. The disturbed SGs are offset in size from their relaxed counterparts, lying close to the upper envelope of the local size-mass relation. The mean size ratio of the disturbed SGs to their relaxed counterparts is similar to 2. Combining this observed size growth with empirical major-merger histories from the literature suggests that the size evolution of a significant fraction (around two-thirds) of SGs in this mass range could be driven by major mergers. If, as is likely, our galaxies are progenitors of more massive (M-* > 10(10.7) M-circle dot) SGs at z < 1, then major mergers are also likely to play an important role in the size growth of at least some massive SGs in this mass range.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available