Journal
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 432, Issue 1, Pages 679-692Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt504
Keywords
gravitational lensing: weak; methods: statistical; galaxies: haloes; galaxies: luminosity function, mass function; cosmology: observations
Categories
Funding
- STFC
- Kavli Foundation
- Royal Society
- National Science Foundation (NSF) [AST-0807458, AST-0909119]
- Packard Foundation
- NSF [AST-0642621]
- NWO-VIDI [639.042.505]
- STFC [ST/I505599/1, ST/K000985/1, ST/J001538/1] Funding Source: UKRI
- Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/K000985/1, ST/J001538/1, ST/H00243X/1, ST/I505599/1] Funding Source: researchfish
- Division Of Astronomical Sciences
- Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0909119] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
Ask authors/readers for more resources
High precision cosmological distance measurements towards individual objects such as time delay gravitational lenses or Type Ia supernovae are affected by weak lensing perturbations by galaxies and groups along the line of sight. In time delay gravitational lenses, 'external convergence', kappa(ext), can dominate the uncertainty in the inferred distances and hence cosmological parameters. In this paper we attempt to reconstruct kappa(ext), due to line of sight structure, using a simple halo model. We use mock catalogues from the Millennium Simulation, and calibrate and compare our reconstructed P(kappa(ext)) to ray-traced kappa(ext) 'truth' values; taking into account realistic uncertainties on redshift and stellar masses. We find that the reconstruction of kappa(ext) provides an improvement in precision of similar to 50 per cent over galaxy number counts. We find that the lowest kappa(ext) lines of sight have the best constrained P(kappa(ext)). In anticipation of future samples with thousands of lenses, we find that selecting the third of the systems with the highest precision kappa(ext) estimates gives a subsample of unbiased time delay distance measurements with (on average) just 1 per cent uncertainty due to line of sight external convergence effects. Photometric data alone are sufficient to pre-select the best-constrained lines of sight, and can be done before investment in light-curve monitoring. Conversely, we show that selecting lines of sight with high external shear could, with the reconstruction model presented here, induce biases of up to 1 per cent in time delay distance. We find that a major potential source of systematic error is uncertainty in the high-mass end of the stellar mass-halo mass relation; this could introduce similar to 2 per cent biases on the time delay distance if completely ignored. We suggest areas for the improvement of this general analysis framework (including more sophisticated treatment of high-mass structures) that should allow yet more accurate cosmological inferences to be made.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available