4.7 Article

Orbit-based dynamical models of the Sculptor dSph galaxy

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 433, Issue 4, Pages 3173-3189

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt956

Keywords

galaxies: dwarf; galaxies: kinematics and dynamics

Funding

  1. NOVA
  2. European Research Council under ERC-Starting Grant [GALACTICA-240271]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have developed spherically symmetric dynamical models of dwarf spheroidal (dSph) galaxies using Schwarzschild's orbit superposition method. This type of modelling yields constraints both on the total mass distribution (e.g. enclosed mass and scale radius) and on the orbital structure of the system (e.g. velocity anisotropy). This method is thus less prone to biases introduced by assumptions in comparison to the more commonly used Jeans modelling, and it allows us to put reliable constraints on their dark matter content. Here we present our results for the Sculptor dSph galaxy, after testing our methods on mock data sets. We fit both the second and fourth velocity moment profiles to break the mass-anisotropy degeneracy. For an Navarro, Frenk & White (NFW) dark matter halo profile, we find that the mass of Sculptor within 1 kpc is M-1 kpc = (1.03 +/- 0.07) x 10(8) M-circle dot, and that its velocity anisotropy profile is tangentially biased and nearly constant for radii beyond similar to 100 pc. The preferred concentration (c similar to 15) is low for its dark matter mass but consistent within the scatter found in N-body cosmological simulations. When we let the value of the central logarithmic slope alpha vary, we find that the best-fitting model has alpha = 0, although an NFW cusp or shallower is consistent at the 1 Sigma confidence level. On the other hand, very cuspy density profiles with logarithmic central slopes alpha < -1.5 are strongly disfavoured for Sculptor.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available