4.7 Article

Simulations of two-planet systems through all phases of stellar evolution: implications for the instability boundary and white dwarf pollution

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 431, Issue 2, Pages 1686-1708

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt289

Keywords

planets and satellites: dynamical evolution and stability; planet-star interactions; stars: AGB and post-AGB; stars: evolution; white dwarfs

Funding

  1. Spanish National Plan of R&D grant 'Planets and stellar evolution' [AYA2010-20630]
  2. EXOZODI [ANR-2010 BLAN-0505-01]
  3. European Union through ERC [279973]
  4. STFC [ST/J001414/1, ST/J001538/1, ST/F00723X/1, ST/J000647/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/J001538/1, ST/F00723X/1, ST/J000647/1, ST/J001414/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Exoplanets have been observed at many stages of their host star's life, including the main-sequence (MS), subgiant and red giant branch stages. Also, polluted white dwarfs (WDs) likely represent dynamically active systems at late times. Here, we perform three-body simulations which include realistic post-MS stellar mass-loss and span the entire lifetime of exosystems with two massive planets, from the endpoint of formation to several Gyr into the WD phase of the host star. We find that both MS and WD systems experience ejections and star-planet collisions (Lagrange instability) even if the planet-planet separation well-exceeds the analytical orbit-crossing (Hill instability) boundary. Consequently, MS-stable planets do not need to be closely packed to experience instability during the WD phase. This instability may pollute the WD directly through collisions, or, more likely, indirectly through increased scattering of smaller bodies such as asteroids or comets. Our simulations show that this instability occurs predominately between tens of Myr to a few Gyr of WD cooling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available