4.7 Article

An exoplanet's response to anisotropic stellar mass loss during birth and death

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 435, Issue 3, Pages 2416-2430

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt1451

Keywords

planets and satellites: dynamical evolution and stability; planet-star interactions; stars: AGB and post-AGB; stars: evolution; stars: mass-loss; stars: winds, outflows

Funding

  1. Churchill College
  2. STFC [ST/J001538/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/J001538/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The birth and death of planets may be affected by mass outflows from their parent stars during the T-Tauri or post-main-sequence phases of stellar evolution. These outflows are often modelled to be isotropic, but this assumption is not realistic for fast rotators, bipolar jets and supernovae. Here we derive the general equations of motion for the time evolution of a single planet, brown dwarf, comet or asteroid perturbed by anisotropic mass loss in terms of a complete set of planetary orbital elements, the ejecta velocity, and the parent star's co-latitude and longitude. We restrict our application of these equations to (1) rapidly rotating giant stars and (2) arbitrarily directed jet outflows. We conclude that the isotropic mass-loss assumption can safely be used to model planetary motion during giant branch phases of stellar evolution within distances of hundreds of au. In fact, latitudinal mass-loss variations anisotropically affect planetary motion only if the mass loss is asymmetric about the stellar equator. Also, we demonstrate how constant-velocity, asymmetric bipolar outflows in young systems incite orbital inclination changes. Consequently, this phenomenon readily tilts exoplanetary orbits external to a nascent disc of the order of degrees.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available