4.7 Article

Stellar velocity dispersions and emission line properties of SDSS-III/BOSS galaxies

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 431, Issue 2, Pages 1383-1397

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt261

Keywords

surveys; galaxies: active; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: general; galaxies: ISM; galaxies: kinematics and dynamics

Funding

  1. Science, Technology and Facilities Council [ST/I001204/1]
  2. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  3. National Science Foundation
  4. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science
  5. University of Arizona
  6. Brazilian Participation Group
  7. Brookhaven National Laboratory
  8. University of Cambridge
  9. Carnegie Mellon University
  10. University of Florida
  11. French Participation Group
  12. German Participation Group
  13. Harvard University
  14. Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias
  15. Michigan State/Notre Dame/JINA Participation Group
  16. Johns Hopkins University
  17. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  18. Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics
  19. Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics
  20. New Mexico State University
  21. New York University
  22. Ohio State University
  23. Pennsylvania State University
  24. University of Portsmouth
  25. Princeton University
  26. Spanish Participation Group
  27. University of Tokyo
  28. University of Utah
  29. Vanderbilt University
  30. University of Virginia
  31. University of Washington
  32. Yale University
  33. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/I505905/1, ST/K00090X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  34. STFC [ST/I505905/1, ST/K00090X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  35. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23740144] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We perform a spectroscopic analysis of 492 450 galaxy spectra from the first two years of observations of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) III/Baryonic Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) collaboration. This data set has been released in the ninth SDSS data release, the first public data release of BOSS spectra. We show that the typical signal-to-noise ratio of BOSS spectra, despite being low, is sufficient to measure stellar velocity dispersion and emission line fluxes for individual objects. We show that the typical velocity dispersion of a BOSS galaxy is similar to 240 km s(-1). The typical error in the velocity dispersion measurement is 14 per cent, and 93 per cent of BOSS galaxies have velocity dispersions with an accuracy of better than 30 per cent. The distribution in velocity dispersion is redshift independent between redshifts 0.15 and 0.7, which reflects the survey design targeting massive galaxies with an approximately uniform mass distribution in this redshift interval. We show that emission lines can be measured on BOSS spectra. However, the majority of BOSS galaxies lack detectable emission lines, as is to be expected because of the target selection design towards massive galaxies. We analyse the emission line properties and present diagnostic diagrams using the emission lines [O II], H beta, [OIII], H alpha and [N II] (detected in about 4 per cent of the galaxies) to separate star-forming objects and active galactic nuclei (AGN). We show that the emission line properties are strongly redshift dependent and that there is a clear correlation between observed frame colours and emission line properties. Within in the low-z sample (LOWZ) around 0.15 < z < 0.3, half of the emission line galaxies have low-ionization nuclear emission-line region (LINER)-like emission line ratios, followed by Seyfert-AGN-dominated spectra, and only a small fraction of a few per cent are purely star-forming galaxies. AGN and LINER-like objects, instead, are less prevalent in the high-z sample (CMASS) around 0.4 < z < 0.7, where more than half of the emission line objects are star forming. This is a pure selection effect caused by the non-detection of weak H beta emission lines in the BOSS spectra. Finally, we show that star-forming, AGN and emission line free galaxies are well separated in the g - r versus r - i target selection diagram.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available