4.7 Article

Non-Gaussian Minkowski functionals and extrema counts in redshift space

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 435, Issue 1, Pages 531-564

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt1316

Keywords

methods: analytical; galaxies: statistics; cosmological parameters; large-scale structure of Universe

Funding

  1. LABEX 'Institut de Lagrange de Paris'
  2. Programme National de Cosmologie
  3. National Science Foundation [NSF PHY11-25915]
  4. University of Alberta
  5. STFC [ST/H008896/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/H008896/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24540267] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the context of upcoming large-scale structure surveys such as Euclid, it is of prime importance to quantify the effect of peculiar velocities on geometric probes. Hence, the formalism to compute in redshift space the geometrical and topological one-point statistics of mildly non-Gaussian 2D and 3D cosmic fields is developed. Leveraging the partial isotropy of the target statistics, the Gram-Charlier expansion of the joint probability distribution of the field and its derivatives is reformulated in terms of the corresponding anisotropic variables. In particular, the cosmic non-linear evolution of the Minkowski functionals, together with the statistics of extrema, is investigated in turn for 3D catalogues and 2D slabs. The amplitude of the non-Gaussian redshift distortion correction is estimated for these geometric probes. In 3D, gravitational perturbation theory is implemented in redshift space to predict the cosmic evolution of all relevant Gram-Charlier coefficients. Applications to the estimation of the cosmic parameters sigma(z) and beta = f/b(1) from upcoming surveys are discussed. Such statistics are of interest for anisotropic fields beyond cosmology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available