4.7 Article

Environment-derived constraints on the progenitors of low-luminosity Type I supernovae

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 434, Issue 1, Pages 527-541

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt1038

Keywords

supernovae: general

Funding

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  2. UK Science and Technology Facilities Council
  3. CONICYT through FONDECYT [3110142]
  4. Millennium Center for Supernova Science [P10-064-F]
  5. ISF
  6. EU/FP7/ERC
  7. Minerva programme
  8. ARCHES programme
  9. Helen and Martin Kimmel Award for Innovative Investigation
  10. STFC [ST/G009465/1, ST/I505821/1, ST/K00185X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  11. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/I505821/1, ST/K00185X/1, ST/G009465/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a study of the properties of the host galaxies of unusual transient objects of two types, both being subluminous compared with the major classes of supernovae. Those of one type exhibit unusually strong calcium features, and have been termed 'Ca-rich'. Those of the second type, with SN2002cx as the prototype and SN2008ha as the most extreme example to date, have some properties in common with the first, but show typically lower ejecta velocities and different early spectra. We confirm important differences in the environments of the two types, with the Ca-rich transients preferentially occurring in galaxies dominated by old stellar populations. Quantitatively, the association of the Ca-rich transients with regions of ongoing star formation is well matched to that of Type Ia supernovae. The SN2002cx-like transients are very different, with none of the present sample occurring in an early-type host, and a statistical association with star-formation regions similar to that of Type II-P supernovae, and therefore a delay time of 30-50 Myr.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available