4.7 Article

The (galaxy-wide) IMF in giant elliptical galaxies: from top to bottom

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 435, Issue 3, Pages 2274-2280

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt1445

Keywords

stars: luminosity function; mass function; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: star formation; galaxies: stellar content

Funding

  1. Programa Nacional de Astronomia y Astrofisica of the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [AYA2010-21322-C03-02]
  2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  3. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/H00260X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. STFC [ST/H00260X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent evidence based independently on spectral line strengths and dynamical modelling point towards a non-universal stellar initial mass function (IMF), probably implying an excess of low-mass stars in elliptical galaxies with a high velocity dispersion. Here, we show that a time-independent bottom-heavy IMF is compatible neither with the observed metal-rich populations found in giant ellipticals nor with the number of stellar remnants observed within these systems. We suggest a two-stage formation scenario involving a time-dependent IMF to reconcile these observational constraints. In this model, an early strong starbursting stage with a top-heavy IMF is followed by a more prolonged stage with a bottom-heavy IMF. Such model is physically motivated by the fact that a sustained high star formation will bring the interstellar medium to a state of pressure, temperature and turbulence that can drastically alter the fragmentation of the gaseous component into small clumps, promoting the formation of low-mass stars. This toy model is in good agreement with the different observational constrains on massive elliptical galaxies, such as age, metallicity, alpha-enhancement, mass-to-light ratio or the mass fraction of the stellar component in low-mass stars.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available